Did Herbert W. Armstrong Teach that Salvation through Christ Is Part of the Gospel?

The question, what is the true gospel, has been controversial in the Church, even today, to the extent it was a contributing cause for a split.  

As I see it so far, and I am yet to hear both sides fully, one side says that the true gospel is only the good news of the coming kingdom of God and that salvation through Christ is not part of that gospel, even though it also should be taught.  The other side says that salvation through Christ is definitely part of the true gospel.

What did Mr. Armstrong teach?  Did he teach that salvation through Jesus Christ is part of the true gospel when that gospel includes the kingdom of God?

This question may be important to some because some people and groups think that Mr. Armstrong's teachings should never be changed.  So if such a person or group follows Mr. Armstrong more than the Bible, the question for them can be important.

In examining Mr. Armstrong's teaching on this subject I will examine his teachings in two books, Mystery of the Ages and The Incredible Human Potential.  

Mystery of the Ages does not have a lot on what is included in the term, the true gospel.  It teaches all the major truths of the gospel, but does not say a lot about that term, "gospel".

On page 200 of Mystery of the Ages, top half of page, Mr. Armstrong writes that Jesus Christ taught His disciples the true gospel of the kingdom of God, and that this included the whole purpose of God in creating the human race.

On page 257, top half, he writes that the churches of this world omit the teaching that Christ is coming as king and ruler, and thus reject Christ's gospel message.  This agrees with what I have said that a message about Christ but without the teaching of the coming government of God is a false gospel.

From the bottom of page 278 through page 279, Mr. Armstrong says that false teachers taught a false gospel, teaching Christ as savior but omitting the teaching that sin is the transgression of the law of God, omitting the coming kingdom of God, the removal of Satan, the government of God ruling the earth, and the opening of salvation to all of humanity, snd that men can become literal sons of God and members of God's family as actual God beings.  By the way this is worded, Mr. Armstrong is implying that all these things that a false gospel message omits are part of the true gospel.

In The Incredible Human Potential, page 1 bottom half through page 2 top half, Mr. Armstrong says that the true gospel, when fully understood, reveals the incredible human potential, the way to peace and happiness, the most necessary information about the human race, the true values, and how man's awesome human potential may be achieved (in other words, how we can be saved).

In the last part of page 10 through all of page 11 he says that the gospel explains the origin of Satan the devil and how he became the great deceiver of mankind.  He says that the true gospel, had it been heeded, could have prevented all the human misery that has occurred, thus indicating that the true gospel includes knowledge of the law and ways of God.  He says that the true gospel includes all these truths: the earth's first prehistoric inhabitants, the reason man was created, the cause of evil and suffering, the nature of the human mind, and what spiritual salvation is and why we need it.

Can we see from this how all-encompassing is the truth included in the true gospel according to Mr. Armstrong?  Since it includes information about salvation, it must include everything about Christ and His sacrifice so we can be saved.

On page 12, middle, he says that the true gospel reveals a wide range of knowledge from God.

On page 15, bottom half, he says that a complete understanding of the message Christ brought from the Father, the gospel, involves an overall understanding of everything.  

On page 16, top half of page, Mr. Armstrong writes that if those in the world who preach what may be called a gospel of salvation really understood and taught what salvation is and how we can be saved, it could be part of the true gospel.  

On page 32, Mr. Armstrong says that the subject of the kingdom of God is an all-encompassing subject.  It includes the pre-history of the universe.

On page 160, top half of page, Mr. Armstrong states that the kingdom of God is both the government of God and the family of God.

It is clear that Mr. Armstrong taught that the true gospel, the good news of the coming kingdom of God, is a broad subject that includes much Bible truth including matters of salvation through Christ made possible by His sacrifice.

If someone today teaches that salvation through Christ is not part of the true gospel of the kingdom of God, they are contradicting Mr. Armstrong.

I recently heard a sermon published by Living Church of God by Mr. Wallace Smith entitled, "The Centrality of Jesus Christ".  In it he shows by quoting from Mr. Armstrong that Mr. Armstrong taught that salvation through Jesus Christ was part of the gospel.  He quotes from letters or other publications of Mr. Armstrong besides the parts of Mr. Armstrong's books I referred to.  I thought the sermon was good and I reccmmend it.

As I explained in a previous post, the word "and" in a passage such as Acts 8:12 where it says, "But when they believed Philip as he preached the things concerning the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ, both men and women were baptized", does not necessarily mean that the gospel of the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ are separate things, but that word "and" can be used for emphasis.  This is saying that both were preached, not that one or the other is not part of the gospel.

For someone who teaches that Mr. Armstrong's teachings should not be changed or added to to say that the name of Jesus Christ and salvation through Jesus Christ are not part of the gospel seems inconsistent to me.  If you are going to change Mr. Armstrong's teaching on this point, at least admit you are changing his doctrine.  To just say that the name of Christ and the gospel should both be preached but are distinct but related things is not sufficient.  The name of Jesus Christ is definitely part of the gospel.  And if you want to say that this is only a matter of terminology - what's the difference as long as we preach both? - then why should it be so important as to split the Church of God over it?

If terminology is important - do we call salvation through Christ a part of the gospel or say it is something separate though related that must also be taught? - then those who say that it is not part of the gospel are wrong according to Mr. Armstrong, they are wrong according to the Bible, and they are wrong - period.

They should admit error, publicly correct their mistake, and teach the truth.

But they will accept correction only if they are wise.  "He who corrects a scoffer gets shame for himself, And he who rebukes a wicked man only harms himself. Do not correct a scoffer, lest he hate you; Rebuke a wise man, and he will love you. Give instruction to a wise man, and he will be still wiser; Teach a just man, and he will increase in learning" (Proverbs 9:7-9).