Sunday, April 3, 2022

Passover Self-Examination, CGA Preaching the Gospel, Fasting to Overcome Bad Habits, and the Ukraine


See comment for added scripture.


Hi, it's me.

I'm not dead, yet.

It has been a long time since I posted to this blog, and I want to update on a few things.


Before taking Passover, we should examine ourselves.  Self-examination is part of preparing ourselves to take Passover in a worthy manner.

"Therefore whoever eats this bread or drinks this cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of the bread and drink of the cup. For he who eats and drinks in an unworthy manner eats and drinks judgment to himself, not discerning the Lord’s body. For this reason many are weak and sick among you, and many sleep" (1 Corinthians 11:27-30).

One way we can examine ourselves is by comparing ourselves with the standards of the Bible.  "For the word of God is living and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to the division of soul and spirit, and of joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart. And there is no creature hidden from His sight, but all things are naked and open to the eyes of Him to whom we must give account" (Hebrews 4:12-13).

Here are passages in the Bible I have found useful in examining myself.

The ten commandments are listed in 2 places, Exodus 20 and Deuteronomy 5.

The sermon on the mount is in 2 places, Matthew chapters 5-7, and Luke chapter 6.

Christ's messages to the seven churches in Revelation chapters 2 and 3 are also good to review.  Regardless of what era we are in, any individual can fall into any one, or more, of these seven categories - that is why Christ says let him who has an ear hear what the Spirit says to the churches - all of them.

Also, 1 Corinthians 13, the love chapter, is a good passage to review for self examination.


Mr. Sheldon Monson, pastor of Church of God Assembly (CGA), announced at Sabbath services April 2 the start of a CGA effort to preach the gospel and the Ezekiel warning to the public.  CGA will run radio ads on station WSM AM 650 Nashville.  The radio ads are one minute in length and are narrated and mostly written by Mr. Kevin Lee.  I believe the ads point to a new website CGA has set up for the public.  The website address is  This website links to the CGA website which links to literature the reader can download from the HWA library.

This radio station is 50,000 watts and can reach 38 states at night.  It is a clear-channel radio station, one that Mr. Armstrong once used.  I think that clear-channel means that no other station uses the same frequency at the same time.  This means that it is easier to hear this station from far away, especially at night.

You can also check out the website to try to listen to the radio station over the Internet.

CGA has signed a one-year contract with the station.  They plan to run ads 20 times a week for the next 4 weeks to start.

You can also download WSM Mobile App for you mobile device to listen to the station.

The ads and websites are set up for four booklets or topics so far, and the goal is to add two more each month, so in a year about 24 booklets will be set up to be advertised.

Mr. Monson and Mr. Fritts plan to record videos, about 20-30 minutes in length.  These will be posted on one of the websites and later may be made available as podcasts.

I am glad CGA is now starting to preach the gospel and the Ezekiel warning to the public.  I hope and am praying that they will be successful.

In the past I have expressed concern that God will not give a wide-open door for preaching the gospel and the Ezekiel warning to CGA if CGA is not willing to follow the example of Mr. Herbert W. Armstrong of learning new knowledge and correcting past mistakes and if CGA is not willing to learn new knowledge from the Bible and believe the Bible more than their own traditions just as they are asking members of the public to do.  I am still concerned about that.

But it may be, that for the sake of some members of CGA who are truly zealous for the gospel and are willing to learn new things from the Bible and believe the Bible more than COG traditions, that God will give CGA a door that is open, perhaps only a little, for preaching to the public.

Every little bit helps.

And if I am completely wrong, and God gives CGA a huge wide-open door, I will be glad for the sake of the gospel, whether I understand the reasons or not.  I will be glad to be wrong if it means the preaching of the gospel and the Ezekiel warning goes forward and prospers.

One thing I have appreciated about Living Church of God is that they publish public information from auditing by an accounting firm of their finances once a year.  From those statements, anyone can see how much LCG is spending on preaching to the public vs. feeding the flock.  This is useful for anyone whose heart is in the gospel and the work to evaluate LCG to see how well they are working to get a message out to the public, so individuals can decide whether or not to support LCG.

I realize that CGA is still getting organized, but I hope that at some time in the future CGA will in some way publish similar information, such as total income for a year, how much is spent on feeding the flock (total of minister salaries, hall rentals, travel expenses, etc.), how much overhead, and how much on the gospel (websites and hosting, radio ad expenses, etc.).


The Church of God has long advised the use of prayer and fasting for overcoming sin and drawing closer to God.  There is scriptural support for this.

There is no direct statement I have found in the Bible that says that you can overcome Satan with fasting.  But consider these passages.

"And when they had come to the multitude, a man came to Him, kneeling down to Him and saying, 'Lord, have mercy on my son, for he is an epileptic and suffers severely; for he often falls into the fire and often into the water. So I brought him to Your disciples, but they could not cure him.' Then Jesus answered and said, 'O faithless and perverse generation, how long shall I be with you? How long shall I bear with you? Bring him here to Me.' And Jesus rebuked the demon, and it came out of him; and the child was cured from that very hour. Then the disciples came to Jesus privately and said, 'Why could we not cast it out?' So Jesus said to them, 'Because of your unbelief; for assuredly, I say to you, if you have faith as a mustard seed, you will say to this mountain, "Move from here to there," and it will move; and nothing will be impossible for you. However, this kind does not go out except by prayer and fasting' " (Matthew 17:14).  See also Mark 9:17-29.

Also, Jesus, before being tempted by Satan fasted for forty days. After and while fasting, He overcame Satan and all Satan's temptations.  After that He began preaching the gospel.  See Matthew 4:1-11, Mark 1:12-15, and Luke 4:1-15.

This fits with the parable of the strong man.  "Or how can one enter a strong man’s house and plunder his goods, unless he first binds the strong man? And then he will plunder his house" (Matthew 12:29).  See also Mark 3:27 and Luke 11:21-22.  Satan is ruler and deceiver of this world.  He is a strong man.  To plunder his house, that is, successfully preach the message of God's truth to Satan's world, we must first bind the strong man and then we can plunder his house.  In a figurative sense, this is what Christ did when He conquered Satan in the temptation in the wilderness.  He overcame Satan by resisting every temptation Satan threw at him.  Then Christ could plunder Satan's house by preaching the gospel.  But notice that fasting was one way Christ prepared Himself to conquer and overcome Satan.

Christ has fully overcome Satan.  But we also should follow the example of Christ in using fasting as a tool for overcoming Satan.

Finally, notice that on the Day of Atonement, when we fast, Satan is bound for a thousand years - see Leviticus 16:7-29, Leviticus 23:27, Numbers 29:7, Revelation 20:1-3.

The Bible therefore associates fasting and prayer with overcoming Satan.  We overcome Satan both to overcome our bad habits and to be successful in preaching God's truth to the world.

But some members may have had the experience of fasting to overcome a problem, yet find that fasting has not helped them.  Things not only do not improve, but may get worse.  They are tempted to conclude that fasting does not work.

But we are to walk by faith, not by sight.  "For we walk by faith, not by sight" (2 Corinthians 5:7).  

Where do you place your trust for the decisions you make and the things you do, in personal experience and observation or in faith, trust, and belief in God's word, the Bible?

We should believe God's word more than our experiences and observations.  

God sometimes tests us, and He may test our faith in His word by not giving us the help we want and expect right away.  But we are to continue to believe God.  God's word teaches that fasting is a way to overcome, and we should believe God's word, trusting Him that He is telling us the truth, and stick with it until we get the results.  If God is testing our faith, we need to make sure we pass the test.

"But without faith it is impossible to please Him, for he who comes to God must believe that He is, and that He is a rewarder of those who diligently seek Him" (Hebrews 11:6).  Fasting is a way of diligently seeking God.  He will reward us though He may test us for a while.


I do not have a lot to say about the war between Russia and the Ukraine.  Some things are obvious to those in the Church of God who understand prophecy and the doctrines of the Church.  By invading the Ukraine, Russia is giving Germany and all western Europe a motivation to develop a strong military for their defense.

I do not know how the war will turn out.  Putin could be overthrown by others in Russia who see this as a mistake.  Putin may push ahead and force a victory by superior military force.  He may use poison gas or nuclear weapons.

Russia can be hurt by American-led economic sanctions, but by applying those sanctions the United States can hurt its own dollar.  You can use a weapon against an enemy, but in the process you wear out or use up or damage your weapon.  There is a price to pay.

Sanctions do not just hurt Russia.  They economically hurt countries that impose the sanctions.  Not every country is willing to pay that price, and those that do not will find ways other than the dollar to trade with Russia.  If you are a country not so committed to supporting the western powers against Russia, and there are many such countries, would you rather use dollars to pay a higher price for a commodity from another country or use some other medium of exchange to buy that commodity from Russia at a lower price, thus saving money and helping your own economy?  Some countries will use a different medium of exchange to trade with Russia, and the effect of this will be to weaken the dollar.

So the long-term effect of this war may be to motivate Europe to build a strong, united military and to contribute to the eventual downfall of the dollar.  And if the dollar fails, there will be great inflation in the United States, especially with anything traded internationally.

Everybody, have a great Passover and Feast of Unleavened Bread.

Don't forget to clean or throw out your toaster.

Sunday, January 16, 2022

Passover Teaching - Spiritual and Physical Healing

We are coming close to Passover and the Days of Unleavened Bread, and preparations are beginning.  Members may begin to prepare by making plans and by examining themselves spiritually (1 Corinthians 11:27-32, 2 Corinthians 13:5).  Scheduled sermon and sermonette speakers and those who conduct Passover services are making plans on what to say in their messages.

We are taught that by Christ's stripes we are healed.  "But He was wounded for our transgressions, He was bruised for our iniquities; The chastisement for our peace was upon Him, And by His stripes we are healed. All we like sheep have gone astray; We have turned, every one, to his own way; And the Lord has laid on Him the iniquity of us all" (Isaiah 53:5-6).

The stripes refer to the beating Christ took before He was crucified.  He suffered so we can be healed.

In the old days of Worldwide Church of God while Mr. Armstrong was alive, the Church emphasized that Christ's suffering paid the penalty for our physical sins - our violations of the laws of health - so we can be physically healed.  This was emphasized so much that I do not remember ever hearing or reading of the spiritual application of that, that we are also healed spiritually.  I do not remember the words "heal" or "healing" ever being applied to our spiritual condition - our character - but only to physical diseases and disabilities.

There is nothing wrong with placing emphasis on certain things to drive home lessons.  Physical healing has not been a doctrine of many traditional churches we came out of, so it needed emphasized teaching.

But spiritual healing is important, and today it should not be neglected.  To be silent on this may be an affirmation that Christ's suffering did not include paying the spiritual price of our sins so our character can be healed.

I have posted about this before for those who want to look up past posts to research this.

Does the Bible ever use the concept of "healing" or "sickness" to refer to spiritual matters, or only to physical diseases?

"Jesus answered and said to them, 'Those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick. I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners, to repentance" (Luke 5:31-32).  Here Christ directly compares physical sickness with the spiritual need for repentence.

In the Old Testament, God prophesied concerning Israel: "I will heal their backsliding, I will love them freely, For My anger has turned away from him" (Hosea 14:4).  Here, God applies the concept of healing to a spiritual matter - backsliding.  The same Hebrew word for "heal" is used here as is used in Isaiah 53:5 that says that by Christ's stripes we are healed.

So in the Bible, healing does not just refer to physical healing.  It refers to spiritual healing also.  In the Church of God, we may call that character building, but it refers to the process of turning from sin and becoming like God and putting on the righteousness of Christ by the power of God's Holy Spirit. It includes getting rid of bad habits and building good habits and learning to live by every word of God as a way of life.

So the passage in Isaiah that refers to being healed by the stripes Jesus Christ suffered includes both physical and spiritual healing.

Does the Church of God acknowledge this?  Or do we deny the role of Christ and His suffering in making possible our spiritual healing?

The Church and its speakers can teach about the healing taught in Isaiah several ways.  A speaker or writer can simply say that Christ's suffering enables our healing without mentioning spiritual or physical healing.  Or, a speaker or writer can refer to "physical healing" and not include spiritual healing.  Or, he can refer to both physical and spiritual healing.  I believe that last way is the best and most accurate way to teach the meaning of Isaiah 53:5.

Among the Churches of God, this seems to vary.  I know of one group that seems to deny the role of Christ's suffering in enabling our spiritual healing by saying that we are healed physically by His stripes, but saying nothing about being spiritually healed.  Another group simply says we are healed without specifying if we are healed physically or spiritually or both.  Yet another group does say we are healed spiritually and physically.  I have not checked all the groups.

If the Church denies the importance of Christ's suffering to pay the penalty of our sins so we can be spiritually healed, what does Christ think about that?  He endured the suffering so we can be healed both spiritually and physically.  He was motivated by love to do this for us.  If we knowingly deny his role in suffering so we can be spiritually healed, because of fear of men or because of unwillingness to believe what God says, what does Christ think about that?  If we do not acknowledge the importance of the suffering He endured in making possible our spiritual healing, are we not denying Christ and showing a lack of appreciation for what He has done for us?

Christ was willing to suffer so we can be spiritually healed.  Are we unwilling to acknowledge and appreciate that?

"Therefore whoever confesses Me before men, him I will also confess before My Father who is in heaven. But whoever denies Me before men, him I will also deny before My Father who is in heaven" (Matthew 10:32-33).  This is a broad principle.  It can include many things.  There is more than one way to deny Christ.

The Church of God and each of us individually are being tested on many matters.  This might be one of them.

And how hard of a test is this, anyway?  How hard would it be for the Churches of God to simply acknowledge that Christ's stripes make possible both our spiritual and physical healing?  Is this a big deal?  We still keep the doctrine of physical healing.  Is it heresy to say we are also healed spiritually by the stripes of Christ just because Mr. Armstrong didn't include that in Mystery of the Ages?

Wednesday, November 3, 2021

The Bible Shows that the Elijah Work of Restoring Doctrine Continues Today

I will cover this very briefly in this post, then refer to other posts in this blog that cover this in more detail.

The Bible shows that the Elijah work of restoring doctrine, that is, "all things", continues today and into the future.

There are people who claim that Herbert W. Armstrong completed the work of restoring doctrine and that, because he completed that work, we should never correct or add to what he has taught.  Assuming they are sincere in wanting to follow their Bibles and live by every word of God, they are making a serious mistake.

Jesus said, "Indeed, Elijah is coming first and will restore all things" (Matthew 17:11).

I, and many others, think that Herbert W. Armstrong was the Elijah to restore all things.

But that does not mean his work is yet complete.  It continues today.  The Church of God today has the responsibility to finish the work started through Mr. Armstrong.  But it is still Mr. Armstrong's work.  He restores all things even today through the Church of God, which God raised up through him for this time, and which Mr. Armstrong trained to finish the work.

This is what the Bible teaches.

Some of those who say we should not change Mr. Armstrong's doctrines because he was the Elijah to come ought to do a Bible study on Elijah, starting with the first Elijah, and be careful not to sweep the scriptures under the rug.

Are scriptures about the first Elijah prophetic?  Can we learn something about the Elijah of our time from what the Bible says about the first Elijah?  If not, why call him Elijah?  Why call Mr. Armstrong Elijah unless that name has some meaning - unless it represents something about the first Elijah we can learn from?

God gave Elijah a job.  He was to do three things.  He was to anoint Hazael as king over Syria, Jehu as king over Israel, and Elisha as prophet in Elijah's place (1 Kings 19:15-16).

Think of this as God giving Mr. Armstrong a commission to restore all things.

Did Elijah do all these things directly himself?  Do your own Bible study.  He did not.  At least one thing he did indirectly through the work of those who followed him, delegating the job.

It was Elisha who anointed Jehu after Elijah was gone, and even he did not do it directly but through an unnamed son of the prophets (2 Kings 9:1-10).  You can think of Elijah and the sons of the prophets as like the Church of God today, continuing the work of Elijah even after Elijah was gone.

This is the principle of delegation, and there are examples throughout the Bible.  One of the clearest is that Christ baptized, not directly but through His disciples (John 4:1-3).

When someone delegates a job to someone else, the first person has the authority, but the ones he delegates the job to are the ones who actually do the work in the name of the first person.

Mr. Armstrong taught and prepared the Church of God to continue his work of restoring all things, even as Elijah delegated the work of anointing Jehu to Elisha, and Elisha delegated it to an unnamed son of the prophets.

If not, what do these scriptures mean?  If those who came after Elijah were not to continue the work God had commissioned Elijah to do, even after Elijah was gone, what does this example show?  Because that is exactly what happened with the first Elijah.

Mr. Armstrong's work of restoring doctrine is to continue through the Church of God he supervised and trained in his lifetime.  That is our responsibility.  And it is Mr. Armstrong's work, and it is attributed to him, even as we do it today, because he started it, he trained us, and we continue his work.

Mr. Armstrong restored all things to the Church of God by teaching us to believe the Bible more than our traditions and by teaching us to understand the Bible by letting the Bible interpret the Bible.  He set that process in motion.  It continues today, but at a slower pace because of the resistance of many COG leaders to changing tradition.  I believe the pace will quicken after God tests us a while.  But it is Mr. Armstrong's work because he set the process in motion.  Mr. Armstrong restores all things today and in the future, because he started the process and we continue in his work.

It has been more than 35 years since Mr. Armstrong died.  God has been testing the Church of God and all its leaders, ministers, and members since that time.  God used Mr. Armstrong to teach the Church, both by his example and his doctrines.  The lesson of his example continues through his autobiography and his other literature and audio recordings, and God is testing us to see how well we learn our lessons.

No group today has a wide-open door for preaching the gospel and the Ezekiel warning to the world.  For some groups, the door is open a little, and wider for some than for others.  For some, it is not open at all.  Maybe when God finishes testing us He will open a door wide for someone.

We should learn from Mr. Armstrong, but is his example important?  Some hold on to a list of doctrines but throw his example out the window.  But Christ said that one perfectly trained will be like his teacher (Luke 6:40).

Mr. Armstrong's example, available through his autobiography, teaches us to believe the Bible more than any man, church, minister, or tradition, to learn new knowledge from the Bible, and to correct mistakes in doctrine.  If we learn from his example, we will follow in his footsteps.  We will change doctrine in order to grow in knowledge of the truth as he did.

We continue the Elijah work of Mr. Armstrong of restoring lost doctrine today, as he trained us, just as Elisha and the sons of the prophets continued the work of the first Elijah.

We either believe the Bible or we don't.  If we reject the Bible, we reject the God who inspired it.

I am not trying to cause division.  I want peace in the Church of God.  But God, in the Bible, warns and corrects those who need correction, and His words are not always gentle.  He also instructs us to warn those who need a warning (Proverbs 24:11-12, Ezekiel 3:17-21).

These warnings and corrections should be given in love, just as a father corrects his children in love, for their good.  God corrects and rebukes and warns in love, and we should do so from the same motivation.  And those who are wise will heed correction and not resent it (Proverbs 9:7-9).

Not everyone who offers correction is causing division.  You can correct someone, in love, and still be a peacemaker.  If the correction is true and if those you correct heed the correction, divisions can be healed and there will be more peace, not less.

"Like an earring of gold and an ornament of fine gold
Is a wise rebuker to an obedient ear" (Proverbs 25:12).

What we may call, "the Ezekiel warning", has two parts.  One is the warning Ezekiel, and those of us like Ezekiel who have the knowledge of the warning and the opportunity to deliver it, are to deliver to Israel.  But a second part is the warning to Ezekiel himself, and us also, if we fail to deliver the warning.  If we do not deliver God's warning, blood guilt will be on our heads.  In other words, God will count us as murderers (Ezekiel 3:17-21).

I want all Israel to hear that warning before tribulation begins, all 500 million people, while there is time for anyone to repent and escape.  I want them to hear it so they know God was fair to warn them and give them a chance.  This glorifies God's name for eternity because it shows God's fairness and compassion.

I also want the Church of God members in all fellowships, and those scattered and at home, to escape the judgment of blood guilt for not doing their part to warn those who need a warning.  That is why I encourage the preaching of the gospel and the Ezekiel warning to the public.

Being willing to practice what we preach is a necessary part of that work.  We cannot close our minds to new knowledge, new truth from the Bible and history, then ask the general public to learn new truth, contrary to our own example.  If we do that, we are hypocrites, and cannot expect good success in delivering God's warning to others.  And God may count us as murderers because we had an opportunity to warn, and we didn't.

We can warn.  We can glorify God's name and reputation for fairness and help Israel by delivering God's warning.  But we must pay a price to do so.  We must leave our comfort zone and be willing to follow the example and work of Mr. Armstrong.  He always put the Bible first, and any new knowledge he found in the Bible, over and above any traditions or teaching of men, even in the Church of God.

If we close our minds to that example, if we turn away from new truth we find in the Bible, if we make it church policy not to go beyond Mr. Armstrong's teaching and never add to it or correct it, as he himself did all his life, we fail, through our own fault, to obtain the open door for giving the warning.  God will put the blood of the people on our heads.

That is what I want to avoid.

I am not trying to cause division.  I am not seeking a personal following.  I am not making any money from this.  No one even knows who I am.  I want peace in the Church of God, but peace that comes from all of us following God's teaching in the Bible.

Here are related posts in this blog. You can find these posts in the column on the right or copy and paste the link into your browser:

TITLE:  Is There a Contradiction Between Learning New Knowledge and Recognizing Herbert W. Armstrong as the Elijah to Restore All Things?
DATE:  Thursday, December 24, 2020
LINK URL (website address, copy and paste in your browser):

TITLE:  How Did the First Elijah Do God's Work?
DATE:  Wednesday, December 30, 2020
LINK URL (website address, copy and paste in your browser):

TITLE:  Elijah (Again)
DATE:  Saturday, January 2, 2021
LINK URL (website address, copy and paste in your browser):

Monday, August 23, 2021

Why Are We Here?

As Mr. Gerald Weston pointed out in a sermon recently published by Living Church of God (LCG), Mr. Herbert W. Armstrong often started his holy day sermons by asking the question, "Why are we here?".

On a holy day, why are we here?  Why do we assemble for holy day services?

We are here because Mr. Armstrong believed the Bible more than the Church.

The Church of God Seventh Day did not keep the holy days.  

Mr. Armstrong knew Christ was the head of the Church of God.  But he never assumed that the Church of God leadership correctly followed Jesus Christ.  Christ leads the Church through the Bible, the Holy Spirit, and circumstances, but Church of God ministers and leaders do not always follow where Jesus Christ leads.  Mr. Armstrong never assumed that the doctrines of the true Church of God were all correct.  He never assumed that the Church had the right interpretation of scripture.  If he saw something in the Bible different from what the Church taught, he believed the Bible, not the Church.  He believed God and His word more than men, even the leadership and ministry of the true Church of God.

So when he saw that the Bible taught that we should keep the holy days, he believed God, not the Church.

That is why we are here.

Saturday, July 24, 2021

Only Those Who Will Believe God More than Man Will Have the Philadelphian Open Door

I recently heard an inspiring sermon on the Internet from a Church of God minister, and I want to share my reactions with my readers in the spirit of "iron sharpens iron".  Some COG members, in different groups and scattered and some at home, may struggle from time to time with questions and issues of, "Who should I support?", and, "Where should I attend?".  When COG members communicate with each other about common problems, we can sometimes help each other with ideas, ideas we can check independently with God's word.  So here I will offer my ideas and thoughts.  You can check what I say in your own Bible studies.  I have also given a number of posts in my blog over the past year on the things I will speak about, and I go into more detail in those posts.

The sermon was about trusting God.  It was given by the leading pastor of a small group that has existed for a short time compared with other Church of God groups.

This pastor is energetic, courageous, bold, hard-working, and intelligent, and he seems to be zealous for God's law and exercising faith in God's protection and blessings.  He is a very inspiring and charismatic speaker.  I enjoyed the sermon, and felt inspired by it.  No doubt many members of this group, and those from other groups or scattered members who stay at home, were inspired by this sermon, or will be if they hear it in the future.

He and the members of his small group seem to have strong faith in God's protection.

And it seems that God has blessed this man and this small group in a way He has not blessed many other Church of God fellowships.  Based on fruits, it seems that God is rewarding their faith and trust in Him.

God may be using this man and the small Church of God fellowship he pastors to teach the whole Church of God - all COG fellowships and scattered members who stay at home - a lesson about faith and trust in God.  God responds to and rewards faith and trust in Him.  He blesses those who are zealous to do His will, who keep His commandments, and who trust Him for their protection.

We can all learn a lesson in that.

And it may be that this is part of why Christ raised up this group, or allowed it to start and prosper.  Christ may be using this group and its pastor to teach lessons to the whole Church of God - all the scattered members and fellowships - about the importance of trusting God in trials and being zealous to do His will.

And for that reason I have considered supporting this group and recommending them to others.  But I can't.

There is a problem.  That problem has not gone away.  Regular readers of this blog probably know where I am going with this.

They are not preaching the gospel to the world or the Ezekiel warning to Israel, which God commands and is God's will.  They are not getting a warning message out to the public, which the people need.  Our nations need that warning, even if they do not heed it, so that when the punishment comes upon them, they will know that God was fair to give them a warning first, and seeing God's fairness and righteousness, to be able to trust God and repent and be teachable, those who survive, in the millennium.  But if they don't hear a warning before they were punished, they will tend to blame God and say, "No one warned me - if God had warned me before He punished me, I would have heeded the warning and repented",  It will be harder for them to trust God enough to repent and be converted.  Some may lose their eternal lives because of this, if they can't see that God was fair to them.

And God is fair to warn.  The Bible shows this.  From the warning to Cain in Genesis to the warning at the end of the book of Revelation, GOD WARNS.  Do a Bible study on this some time.  You may end up reading the whole Bible.

But this small group and its leader - who gave such an inspiring sermon on the blessings of trusting God and having courage to obey Him - has not begun to warn our nations in God's name.  The warning is God's message to the nations, not our message.  We are the delivery service God has commissioned to deliver His warning message.  We have received the message from God's hand, put it in our pocket. and sat on it without delivering it, many of us.  That does not honor God and magnify His name.

Many members of this group have come out of one or more groups that are getting the warning message and the true gospel out to the nations.  By departing from those groups and forming a group that does not preach the gospel and the warning to the public, they have hurt and diminished the work of God.

But maybe this group is getting ready to start a work, a powerful work that God will empower and bless, to preach the gospel to the world and the Ezekiel warning about the tribulation to come to Israel.  Maybe God will reward this group and its leader for their zeal and trust in Him by giving them the open door for preaching the gospel promised to Philadelphia, and maybe God will empower them and lead them to go through that open door with great power and awesome results!

Not likely.


This leader and group have, in works, denied the way of life Mr. Armstrong practiced that enabled God to give Mr. Armstrong an open door for the gospel and the warning message.

In past posts I have expounded on this at length, and I encourage you to read those posts in this blog.

But if you have questions about this, read Mr. Armstrong's autobiography, and ask, why did God give him and his early supporters an open door for preaching the true gospel and the Ezekiel warning to the public?

Mr. Armstrong did not start the Church of God.  He learned from and began to attend with the Church of God Seventh Day.

But God did not start a Philadelphia work with Church of God Seventh Day.  He started it with Mr. Armstrong and the group he led, first called the "Radio Church of God" and later renamed "Worldwide Church of God".  And God didn't start the Philadelphia era until Mr. Armstrong began to separate from Church of God Seventh Day.


There was an important difference between Church of God Seventh Day and Mr. Armstrong.  They did not practice the same way of life exactly.  That difference qualified Mr. Armstrong for the open door and helped make him a Philadelphian.  That same difference disqualified Church of God Seventh Day from being used by God to preach a powerful message to the public.

That difference was simple.  Mr. Armstrong was willing to believe God more than man.

He was willing to believe and follow what God says in the Bible more than he believed and followed any man, more than any minister or Church of God leader, more than any church organization, and more than any tradition.  He was willing to change his traditions to follow God's word wherever it led him, even if it meant overturning previous Church of God teachings and traditions, and even if it meant adding new knowledge to what the Church of God already had.  

He was also willing to correct his own errors when God corrected Him through the Bible.

He was willing to change.

And that is a vital difference.  Church of God Seventh Day was not willing to correct its errors, not willing to change its traditions, and not willing to learn new knowledge.  In short, they were not willing to change.

And like Church of God Seventh Day, like the Catholic Church, like the Protestant churches, the small group and its leader I mentioned who gave such an inspiring sermon on trusting God are not willing to change. They will not let the Bible correct them in doctrine.  They will not learn new things from the Bible.  Instead, they are committed, at least the leader, to sticking with the teachings of Mr. Armstrong.  Mr. Armstrong was willing to correct his own errors and learn new things from God, but it seems this leader is not.  He will not correct Mr. Armstrong's errors and he will not correct his own, as I understand him from what he has publicly said.  He seems not willing, so far, to learn anything new that Mr. Armstrong did not teach.

In this, he is showing more faith in Mr. Armstrong and his teachings than he shows towards God and His word, the Bible.  And this means he is making an idol out of Mr. Armstrong.  Why an idol?  Because faith must always be towards God, not man.  To have faith in a man, any man, is to give that man the faith that should belong only to God.  Faith is a form of worship.  To have faith in a man is to make an idol of that man.

That is not the way of life Mr. Armstrong practiced.

How ironic!  In publicly committing himself to believe everything Mr. Armstrong taught he is denying the way of life Mr. Armstrong practiced.  In words he shows love to Mr. Armstrong, but in works he denies him.  Sound familiar?  Many in the world do the same thing with Christ.  They show praise towards Christ with their mouths but in works they deny Him.  They will not live the way of life Christ practiced as an example.

Why was it important to God that the Philadelphia work be led by one (Mr. Armstrong) who was willing to believe the Bible more than man and was willing to be corrected by the Bible and learn new things from the Bible?

Because to preach to the public, we must ask them to do exactly the same thing.  Whoever has an open door for preaching the gospel must ask the public to learn new things, to change their beliefs and traditions, and to believe the Bible more than any church or man or tradition.  And whoever does that kind of preaching had better practice what they preach.  

When you read Mr. Armstrong's autobiography, look how many times God tested people on this.  Loma Armstrong was tested.  Mr. Herbert W. Armstrong was tested.  Church of God Seventh Day was tested.  A Sunday keeper who had the gift of healing, who taught Mr. Armstrong about healing, was tested.  Radio listeners who heard Mr. Armstrong say, don't believe me, believe God, believe your Bible, were tested.  And we are tested today.

Will God give the pastor of the small group I mentioned, who gave such an inspiring sermon on trusting God, an open door for preaching the gospel and the Ezekiel warning to the public?

So far, God has not.  And as long as that man is publicly committed to believing Mr. Armstrong's writings and not being willing to believe the Bible first and correct Mr. Armstrong's mistakes or learn new knowledge from the Bible that Mr. Armstrong did not have, I don't think God will give that man an open door for the gospel.

Could I be mistaken in this?

I hope I am.  I don't see how.  But I hope I am wrong.  I hope Christ gives that man an open door and he does a powerful work of preaching the gospel.  If that happens, I won't easily understand it, but I will be glad for the sake of the gospel.

No one has emailed me or entered comments to show me where I am wrong in this.  So if I am wrong, I don't know it.  I don't think I am wrong.

Any Church of God leader or group that wants the open door promised to Philadelphia should be willing to learn new knowledge from the Bible and believe the Bible first over any Church of God teachings or traditions, and not try to "hold fast" to Mr. Armstrong's teachings, contrary to the way of life Mr. Armstrong himself practiced.  

If we ask the public to be willing to learn new things, we must also be willing to learn new things.  If we won't, I don't think God will give the open door to hypocrites.

Getting back to the speaker and group I mentioned at the beginning.

I don't see that willingness to practice the way of life Mr. Armstrong practiced in that pastor or his followers and supporters.

And yet, he seems to have zeal for trusting God for protection, and God seems to have blessed him for that zeal.  He gave a powerful sermon that we can learn from.

That man, and his group, may be useful in other ways for God's purposes.  He has lessons he can teach the Church of God.

I am not against him.

But his group does not seem to be a home for Philadelphians.  And I do not encourage Philadelphians in a group that has an open door for preaching the gospel, and is going through that door, to shift their support to a group that does not have an open door for the gospel and is not likely to have it in the future, unless they repent of making an idol of Mr. Armstrong and his teachings.

Look at the messages to the seven churches in Revelation chapters 2 and 3.  Christ teaches us to read all the messages and examine ourselves in the light of those messages.  Even though we are in the Laodicean era, any message can apply to any individual among us.  And Philadelphians are not the only church that receives only praise.

Look at the message to Smyrna.  "And to the angel of the church in Smyrna write, 'These things says the First and the Last, who was dead, and came to life: "I know your works, tribulation, and poverty (but you are rich); and I know the blasphemy of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan. Do not fear any of those things which you are about to suffer. Indeed, the devil is about to throw some of you into prison, that you may be tested, and you will have tribulation ten days. Be faithful until death, and I will give you the crown of life." He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches. He who overcomes shall not be hurt by the second death' " (Revelation 2:8-11).

Smyrna is not Philadelphia.  They are not promised an open door for the gospel.  Yet, Christ has no criticism or them, but rather says they are rich, implying they are spiritually rich (since they are physically poor).  He praises them and encourages them to continue.

I am not saying that any group today is Smyrna.  But I bring this out to show you do not have to be Philadelphian to be spiritually rich.  The promise of the open door is not for everyone.  God can give one leader or one group a job and a different leader and a different group a different job.

What if God, in His wisdom, has raised up this leader and group, not for preaching the gospel, but to teach the lessons of zeal for God and trust in God in times of trial?  And what if God has given a different job, the job of going through an open door for preaching the gospel, to a different leader and group where most of the Philadelphians already are?

There is great value in being a Philadelphian.  A Philadelphian loves God and wants to magnify His name and reputation.  He is intensely zealous for getting the message out that will show all creation for all eternity God's righteousness and fairness to warn before punishing.  He also loves his neighbors as himself and is very concerned that they get a warning while there is time for them to repent and escape God's punishment.  And like Mr. Armstrong and Mr. Armstrong's early supporters who heard him on the radio, a Philadelphian is willing to believe God more than any man or church or tradition and is willing to learn new things from God's word, just as he asks the public to do.

Though the group and their pastor who gave such an inspiring sermon I described in the beginning may do good works in many ways, they will not be, in my opinion, a suitable home for Philadelphians who have an open door for the gospel.

But if this man and his group are not Philadelphian, and if God is not with this man, why is God blessing him?

There is a myth in the Church of God, and that myth says that God only works through one man at a time.  But the Bible does not teach that.

God worked through many prophets at the same time.  He worked through Ezekiel and Jeremiah at about the same time.  He worked through Nathan and David at the same time.  He worked through several prophets in the time of Ezra.  He worked through Peter and Paul at the same time.

God can work through one leader in our time to preach the gospel and one or more other leaders to serve other groups, or even the whole Church of God, in other ways.

God can teach the whole Church of God lessons about trust and zeal through this man while preaching the gospel through a different man and group.  God can also use this man to serve the needs of those who are not Philadelphian but are in some other spiritual condition.  God loves them too.

Will God condemn a man for making an idol of Mr. Armstrong?

None of us is perfect, and we all have faults to strive against.  Look at the example of Gideon.  After God used him in a powerful way, he became a ruler in Israel and made an idol and it became a snare to him.  Yet, he is mentioned in the faith chapter in Hebrews, and it is therefore likely God forgave him.

In Mr. Armstrong's autobiography, there was a Sunday keeper, apparently unconverted, who had the gift of healing.  He prayed for people to be healed, and God answered his prayers.  God did not reject him just because he did not keep the Sabbath.  And God used him to teach Mr. Armstrong about healing.  But when God's time came, God tested this man by having Mr. Armstrong show him the truth about the Sabbath from the Bible.  He rejected the Bible, stayed with his tradition, and failed the test.  Then, God rejected him and no longer answered his prayers for healing.  He lost the gift.  But before this, for for a time, God was patient with his faults, answered his prayers, and used him in a powerful way to teach Mr. Armstrong.

I hope the speaker I mentioned in the beginning and his group enjoy success in whatever role God assigns to them.  But unless that man repents of not being willing to learn new things from the Bible and not being willing to correct any mistakes of Mr. Armstrong, I do not think God will give him a wide-open door for preaching the gospel.  So far, God hasn't.

If you have zeal for the gospel message and Ezekiel warning, and if you are willing to learn new things from the Bible and to believe the Bible more than your group leader or Mr. Armstrong or any Church of God tradition, and if you want to be counted by God as a Philadelphian and have the promised open door, I urge you to support a group that already has that open door, and don't move to a group that does not have the open door and disqualifies itself from having that open door.

There may be several groups that have an open door for the gospel, and for some the door is open wider than for others.  I have said this before and I still say it - in my opinion, despite not being perfect, the fellowship that is right now doing the best job of going through an open door for preaching the gospel is Living Church of God.

Tuesday, April 27, 2021

Did Mr. Armstrong Make a Mistake in Telling the Church to Follow Mr. Tkach?

Did Mr. Armstrong make a mistake when he told the Church to follow the new pastor general, who was Mr. Tkach?


Mr. Armstrong gave a sermon to the Church shortly before he died.  He was sick at the time, and he knew he might soon die.  This might have been his last sermon to the Church.

He talked about a number of things, but he also said that if he should die God would provide a new pastor general and we better follow that pastor general if we wanted to be in the kingdom of God.  He did not put any qualification on following the next pastor general.  He did not say, follow him as he follows Christ.  He did not say, follow him as he follows the Bible.  He just said we better follow him, period.  

He did not name Mr. Tkach in that sermon.  That came later, in a letter.

You can probably find that sermon in sites that publish Mr. Armstrong's material.  

There are some points to pay attention to.

Mr. Armstrong's statement to the Church that we must follow the next pastor general if we want to be in the kingdom of God was DOCTRINE.  Doctrine is simply teaching.  Teaching is doctrine no matter if it is given verbally in a sermon or in writing in an article or book.  If it is teaching, it is doctrine, period.  This statement about the next pastor general was something Mr. Armstrong taught the Church in his sermon.  It was doctrine.

Also, it was wrong.  If we followed the next pastor general, we would go into Protestantism.  We would fall away from the truth we had.  And many did follow Mr. Tkach and fall away from the truth.  Whether or not those people were deceived and influenced by Mr. Armstrong's wrong teaching on that, and to what extent they were influenced by him, I do not know.  But Mr. Armstrong's teaching certainly seemed to make it easier for members to fall away.

Mr. Armstrong could have said, follow the next pastor general as he follows Christ, or, as he follows the Bible.  But he didn't.  He didn't put any qualifications or conditions on it.  We were to follow the pastor general of the Church, period.  And that was obviously wrong doctrine, as the history of what happened after that shows.

It was something Mr. Armstrong never corrected to the end of his life.  Critics of learning new knowledge might say, if you point out his error of saying Pentecost was on a Monday, that he corrected his errors before he died and that the doctrines he taught at the end of his life should be held fast to and not changed.  But you cannot apply that to his statement about following Mr. Tkach.  He died in a matter of weeks or months after he made that statement.  He never corrected it.  It stands today as part of the body of doctrine he taught.

Also, it was harmful to anyone who believed, followed, and taught that doctrine.  God no doubt allowed Mr. Armstrong to make that mistake to test the members, but in this case, the only way to pass the test was to reject that doctrine.  You could not pass the test by believing Mr. Armstrong and following Mr. Tkach.  If you did that, you would fall away.  The way to pass the test was to recognize that Mr. Armstrong was wrong and not follow Mr. Tkach.  To believe Mr. Armstrong's teaching on this was to fail a test and reap the consequences, which in this case may include, for some members, going into the lake of fire.

So those who say we are not to change Mr. Armstrong's doctrines today, not correct any errors, not add any new knowledge to the things he taught in his lifetime, have a problem.  How can they reconcile their position with the fact that NONE OF THEM follows their own position?

None of them believe, obey, or teach Mr. Armstrong's instruction before he died to follow Mr. Tkach.  They can't!  If they did, they would have to abandon most of Mr. Armstrong's other doctrines as Mr. Tkach did.

Their whole position is self-contradictory.  How can they explain it?

No doubt, this is why Christ allowed Mr. Armstrong to make this serious mistake in doctrine at the end of his life, a mistake no Church of God member can deny.  God is showing us that we are NOT to hold fast to Mr. Armstrong's doctrines.  They are not trustworthy, of themselves, just because he taught them.  They are only trustworthy as proved in the Bible because God, the author of the Bible, is trustworthy, but not man.

I challenge any Church of God leader who holds the position that we should only stick to the teachings of Herbert W. Armstrong and not change anything he taught or learn anything new from the Bible to answer this:  If we are to hold fast to the teachings of Mr. Armstrong, shouldn't we hold fast to his teaching that we should follow Mr. Tkach?  And if we don't do that, how can we hold fast to Mr. Armstrong's teaching?  

If you are a member attending a COG fellowship led by such a leader, do you have the guts, or the interest, to ask him this question?  And if you are afraid to ask it because you anticipate a hostile reaction, why attend with such a man?  Why support him if you can't ask him a question?

Remember, when Mr. Armstrong taught us to follow Mr. Tkach, it was at the end of his life.  How long had Mr. Armstrong been converted?  How much life experience did Mr. Armstrong have in learning from God's word, the Bible, and teaching it?  How many years did he have to grow in the grace and knowledge of Jesus Christ?  How many trials did he face, and how many years did he have to build the character of Jesus Christ?

He was converted in 1927 I believe.  He died in 1986.  That makes 59 years of learning, living, and teaching God's way of life, being converted, having God's Holy Spirit dwelling in him.

If ever there was a time when he would be at the peak of his spiritual discernment, if there was ever a time when he was close to God, it would be at the end of that lifetime of accomplishment in God's service, a lifetime in which God used him to preach the gospel and the Ezekiel warning powerfully to the nations of Israel and the world.  Yet, it was at the end of that life when he made such a serious mistake, a mistake that may have hurt the chances for salvation for many members, and God allowed it.

If God allowed him to make such a serious mistake at the end of his life, God could have allowed him to make a mistake in anything he taught any time in his life.  God does not want us to hold fast to and trust the teachings of any man or any church tradition.  He wants us to hold fast to and trust Him and His word, the Bible.  And that means believing and trusting what we can see and understand in our own Bibles.

Can we make mistakes in our reading of the Bible?  Can we misunderstand the Bible?

Of course!  We can make mistakes.  We can be wrong.  We should strive for the humility to admit this to ourselves, and we should always have an open mind to be corrected by the Bible.

But let ministers correct us in our doctrinal errors by the Bible, not by their own authority or traditions.  And let ministers and Church of God leaders also be willing to be corrected by the Bible and admit when they are wrong.

All of us, members and ministers and top Church of God leaders, must believe God more than man or tradition.  We have to put the Bible first.  We have to believe God's word unconditionally, if we are to be completely faithful.  We have to believe the Bible more than we believe Mr. Armstrong, or Mystery of the Ages, or any Church leader, minister, or tradition.  We have to believe what we can see and understand for ourselves in the Bible.

We can certainly make mistakes, and we should be humble and teachable and be willing to let the ministry show us our mistakes in the Bible (if the ministry is willing and able to do that).  But even there, after the ministry tries to show us we are wrong according to the Bible, we may not see it for ourselves.  If the ministry itself is wrong, if they misapply the scriptures, if they interpret the scriptures instead of letting the Bible interpret itself, we may see that they are wrong.

The bottom line is, God tests our faith in Him and His word.  Any time we see a contradiction between the Bible and what the Church of God or any of its fellowships teaches, we are faced with a choice, and God will judge us based on our choice.  We have to choose to believe God or man.  One must take precedence over the other.  Even if we are making a mistake, that does not change the nature of the choice.  Until we understand our mistake, we still have to choose between believing God or man.

Does this cause division?  No, it does not.  It only causes division if we talk about it with other members.  It is the promotion of our view with other members, in contradiction to the ministry, that causes division.  We do not have that right to contradict the ministry with other members.  God has given the teaching role to the ministry, and we have to show respect to the office God has given them.  But we can quietly believe God.  We can wait for Christ to correct the Church, even if we wait until He returns.

But we must obey God first and we must believe God first.  Both belief and obedience are ways of putting our trust and loyalty in God more than man.

Any man who says he leaves a group to obey God rather than man, but does not believe God's word more than the man, Herbert W. Armstrong, is not being consistent.  But he is inconsistent anyway in believing we should stick to Mr. Armstrong's teachings and not learn anything new, contrary to Mr. Armstrong's own way of life, and yet does not believe what Mr. Armstrong said about following Mr. Tkach.

God allowed Mr. Armstrong to make the mistake of telling us to follow Mr. Tkach.  I believe God did this for the very purpose of showing the ministry and membership that we should never believe any man or tradition more than God's word, the Bible.  You couldn't ask for a more powerful and compelling demonstration.

I have said before in this blog that God is unlikely to give us an open door for the gospel if we are not willing to learn new things from the Bible and believe the Bible more than our traditions, because this is what we ask the public to do, and we must do the same or we are hypocrites.  

How does Christ open the door for preaching the gospel?  In these days of freedom and prosperity, it is primarily by arousing zeal in the heart of a leader, and members, for preaching the gospel.  We have freedom and we have money, but we need zeal, or the work will not be done.  Some of that zeal is a voluntary choice, but it is also supplied by God.  And I do not think God will give that zeal to a leader who says he only wants to go by what Mr. Armstrong taught and not learn anything new, a leader that holds fast to a list of doctrines but not the way of life that Mr. Armstrong practiced and that made him a Philadelphian in God's sight.

So look at the Church of God landscape.  Look at a leader who says he will not learn anything new from God.  Look at a leader who says he believes Mr. Armstrong unconditionally, and will not consider that he should believe the Bible more than Mr. Armstrong.  Then look at his zeal for the gospel.  Chances are, his zeal is weak.  Why?  Because God does not arouse zeal for the gospel in his heart and mind.  Why?  Because God can't use him for the gospel.  He won't do what he has to ask others to do - learn new things and let the Bible overrule their traditions.  God is unlikely to use a hypocrite to do His work.

But how can you know a leader's zeal or lack of it?  Not by his words.  And we can't read his mind and heart.  Look at his actions.  Look at the fruits.  If many months go by and he has not started preaching the gospel, that is a strong signal that his heart is not in it, no matter what he says.  If he gives greater priority to teen camps, summer camps, winter weekends, and buying property for the Church - none of which is commanded by God - over preaching the gospel and the Ezekiel warning - which is strongly commanded by God - then how can his heart be in the gospel?

If he repents of his position of not learning from the Bible and not putting the Bible first over Mr. Armstrong's teachings, then perhaps Christ will give him an open door by arousing and inspiring zeal for the gospel in his heart and mind.  That zeal would then lead to right decisions.  But if he continues to reject knowledge, how can God help but not reject him from having an open door to do His work (Hosea 4:6)?

Sunday, April 25, 2021

Did Mr. Armstrong Make a Mistake in Naming Mr. Tkach as His Successor?

Did Mr. Armstrong make a mistake when he named Mr. Tkach as his successor?


Mr. Tkach changed all the important doctrines Mr. Armstrong taught, and as a result, many fell away and the rest were scattered into many competing fellowships.  Why was this not a mistake?

It was God's will to scatter the Church at this time, to rebuke us and to test us.

We had become Laodicean.  Christ says to the Laodiceans, "So then, because you are lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will vomit you out of My mouth" (Revelation 3:16).  The scattering that occurred after the death of Mr. Armstrong was Christ vomiting us out of His mouth.  He still loves us, but He wants us to repent.  "As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten. Therefore be zealous and repent" (Revelation 3:19).

The scattering of the Church of God after the death of Mr. Armstrong was intended by Christ to bring some of us to repentance.  But to bring about that scattering, Christ needed to appoint someone to replace Mr. Armstrong who would take the actions that would lead to the scattering.  Mr. Armstrong could not do it himself.  He would never deliberately scatter the Church.  But Mr. Tkach could do it by changing doctrine.  So Christ took Mr. Armstrong out of the way and appointed Mr. Tkach to replace him.

Christ appointed Mr. Tkach, not Mr. Armstrong.  Christ arranged events and inspired Mr. Armstrong to cause Mr. Armstrong to appoint Mr. Tkach.  In the letter Mr. Armstrong wrote to the Church naming Mr. Tkach as his successor, Mr. Armstrong plainly stated that it was Christ who was appointing Mr. Tkach, and he was right.  Christ knew what he was doing.  Christ did not just allow Mr. Armstrong to name Mr. Tkach as the next pastor general - He caused it.  He inspired Mr. Armstrong to know that it was Christ's will that he name Mr. Tkach his successor.

So it was not a mistake.

Mr. Armstrong no doubt made mistakes in some of his thinking.  He thought Mr. Tkach would be faithful to true doctrine from the Bible, the same body of doctrine that Mr. Armstrong taught.  Christ had a different reason.  Mr. Armstrong did the right thing for the wrong reason.  But what he did was not a mistake.

When Mr. Armstrong named Mr. Tkach as the next pastor general, he made the right decision but for the wrong reason.  His thinking that Mr. Tkach would be faithful to doctrine was a mistake.  But the appointment of Mr. Tkach was the right decision for a different reason, a reason Mr. Armstrong did not understand.

Jesus Christ made the decision to appoint Mr. Tkach, and that was the right decision.  Christ made that decision, knowing Mr. Tkach would change doctrine in a wrong way, because Christ wanted to scatter the Church of God because of its being Laodicean and lukewarm.  He did this for a good reason - to test the Church and to shake the Church up to help its members wake up and begin to take things seriously.  Too many members were just coasting.  They needed a hit on the side of the head to wake up.

Jesus Christ inspired Mr. Armstrong and led him to appoint Mr. Tkach.  That was not a mistake.  But Christ did not reveal the real reason to Mr. Armstrong, and Christ allowed Mr. Armstrong to choose Mr. Tkach using a wrong reasoning process, and that reasoning process was Mr. Armstrong's mistake.  Mr. Armstrong didn't know that Christ wanted to scatter the Church.  Frankly, it would have been difficult for Mr. Armstrong to deliberately name an unqualified man, but that was what Christ wanted at that time - a man unqualified to properly lead the Church in true doctrine.  This would cause the Church to be scattered.

So Christ allowed Mr. Armstrong to make a mistake in his reasoning process to name Mr. Tkach, thinking Mr. Tkach would be faithful, but Christ wanted Mr. Tkach for the opposite reason - He knew Mr. Tkach would be unfaithful in matters of doctrine.

We the members were lukewarm, and Christ gave us the kind of leader we deserved.

So Christ let Mr. Armstrong make a mistake in evaluating Mr. Tkach's qualifications and character.  Christ led Mr. Armstrong to name Mr. Tkach by letting Mr. Armstrong see Mr. Tkach's strong points - perhaps his hard work, courage, energy, obedience to Mr. Armstrong, etc. - but hiding from Mr. Armstrong an awareness of Mr. Tkach's flaws in understanding the Bible.

So Mr. Armstrong, in that sense, used wrong reasoning but arrived at the right decision for God's purposes.  He made a mistake in thinking Mr. Tkach would be faithful to true doctrine, but he made the right decision - the decision Christ wanted him to make - to appoint Mr. Tkach.

Here is an example that illustrates how Christ can let his ministers make "mistakes" that are not really mistakes.

At the beginning of the COVID-19 crisis, Mr. Gerald Weston, presiding evangelist of Living Church of God (LCG), had scheduled a ministerial conference where ministers would gather from all over the world to meet.  Hotel space was rented.  With COVID-19 starting up, Mr. Weston had to make the decision about whether or not to cancel the conference.  After getting advice, he decided not to cancel.  He expected the conference to take place.  If he had cancelled, LCG would have lost money on hotel space it had booked because of penalties for late cancellation, or something like that.

But, as I understand it, a short time after that, the hotel cancelled, forcing the conference to be cancelled.  Here is the important thing.  Because the hotel cancelled, the Church saved money because the hotel did not charge a cancellation penalty.

Would you call Mr. Weston's decision to not cancel earlier a mistake?  He thought the conference would take place, so he didn't cancel the hotel reservation.  He was wrong about the conference taking place, but the decision to not cancel was the best decision because it gave time for the hotel to cancel, and because it was the hotel's decision, they charged the Church no penalty.  But if the Church made the decision to cancel a week earlier, the hotel would charge us a penalty.

Do you see what I am driving at?  Mr. Weston made the right decision for the wrong reason.  I don't call Mr. Weston's decision not to cancel the hotel reservation a mistake.  It was the very best decision that he could make.  By waiting for the hotel to cancel instead of LCG cancelling, LCG saved money.

But Mr. Weston wasn't trying to save money.  He thought the conference would take place.  He was wrong about that.  But Christ worked it out perfectly.

This is why some ministers have said that God makes even the Church's "mistakes" work out.  But I don't call those kinds of decisions "mistakes".  Some of the reasoning that leads to those decisions may be mistaken, but the decisions themselves are right in God's eyes.

One more example, this time an analogy, not real.

Suppose you are praying for a better job.  Or if you are single, you might be praying for a wife.  Then suppose you are taking a train, and there are many trains at the train station.  You get on the train, but after the train pulls out of the station you realize you got on the wrong train.  You figure you made a mistake, and from your point of view, it was a mistake, but not from Christ's point of view, because He caused you to get on the wrong train.  Why?  Because on that "wrong" train, you meet an old friend who has his own business, you have a conversation, and it leads to an offer for a better job, just what you prayed for.  Or, you meet your future wife, who is in the Church, on that train.  That "wrong" train was actually the right train for Christ to answer your prayers.  It was not a mistake from God's point of view.

Or, while riding on that "wrong" train, you pull out a Church booklet, a passenger notices the title and asks about it, a conversation takes place, and that passenger ends up coming into the Church.  It was the right train from God's point of view, but your thinking was in error when you got on it.

So Mr. Armstrong's decision to name Mr. Tkach as the next pastor general was not a mistake from God's point of view.  It was exactly what Christ wanted to happen in order to carry out what He said He would do in Revelation 3:16.