Is There Too Much Emphasis on Getting the Bride Ready?

We have all read the scripture that says, "Let us be glad and rejoice and give Him glory, for the marriage of the Lamb has come, and His wife has made herself ready" (Revelation 19:7).  And we are often encouraged to make the changes in our lives we need to make so we can be saved.

It is good to place a certain amount of emphasis on these things.

But making ourselves ready and getting into the kingdom of God - being personally saved - can be overemphasized.

This can be overemphasized at the expense of doing God's work for the benefit of others, especially getting the true gospel and the Ezekiel warning out to all the nations of Israel before the great tribulation begins so that the people know that God was fair to warn them while they had time to repent - to warn them about things they are doing that they do not know are wrong.  To properly repent and turn to God and have faith in God and accept Jesus Christ as personal savior, the people need to trust God.  That trust, and the salvation that results, is made more difficult if people are plunged into the punishment of the great tribulation for doing things God never warned them about - things they think are right because God never sent them a message telling them they are wrong.  They will feel they never had a chance to escape the punishment and that God is unfair.  This will make their repentance and salvation more difficult, and thus, less likely.  Millions may go into the lake of fire as a result.

This situation is not the same as in the first century.  Our time is unique.  The existing generation is part of this age of man when Satan deceives the whole world, yet will live into the millennium.  In that millennium, salvation will be opened to all.  Satan will be put away.  All will be called to salvation.

That means that the messages we preach to the public will be heard by millions WHO WILL BE CALLED.  They may have limited understanding and belief now, but that will change in their lifetimes.  After Christ returns, Satan is put away, and these people are called to salvation, many will be able to remember what we told them.  Our message to them now will be part of their calling and preparation for conversion in the millennium.  That has never been true before.

We are instructing the first generation of the millennium.

Should our primary focus be on helping these people be saved by getting a message out to them or on saving ourselves?

One focus is inward and the other is outward.

"For whoever desires to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for My sake and the gospel's will save it" (Mark 8:35).

Notice Christ said, for the gospel's sake.  That sounds like an emphasis on the outgoing work of helping to save others through the message of the gospel and the Ezekiel warning, not an emphasis on the inward-focused work of getting ourselves ready so we can be saved.

I want to paint a hypothetical scenario to help illustrate this, and I will ask, what would you do?

Imagine that you are attending a Church of God fellowship you regard as spiritually strong and faithful.  You respect the leader.  He is a good speaker, he shows love towards the membership, and he is honest with the scriptures.

Now imagine that the work of preaching the gospel is being done, not only by your own fellowship, but by many Church of God fellowships.  It seems that Christ has opened the doors and the gospel is going out with ever-increasing power to millions, like it did when Mr. Armstrong was alive.  Every week that goes by thousands more people hear the truth for the first time, and many are responding.  All the tithes you and others pay, all your offerings, all your prayers for the work, seem to be producing good fruit week by week.

You are working and have an income and are joyful to be helping to get the message out.

But even while the work of the Church is doing great, conditions in the world are horrible.  The United States is terribly weak and on the edge of collapse.  Europe has become militarily the strongest power in the world.  Conflict between America and Europe is near the breaking point and war can break out at any time.  We are in a severe drought and food shortages are beginning.  It seems obvious that the tribulation is almost upon us.

More than that, it is the time of the year for fleeing.  It is the spring.  We cannot know the year but we can estimate the time of year when the tribulation will begin.

Everyone in the Church of God is anticipating a call to flee to a place of safety very soon.

Then one day, your pastor, the leader of the fellowship you attend, the man you greatly respect, has a special announcement.  He says that God has told him it is time to flee, the great tribulation will soon begin this year.  Maybe he had a dream or a vision.  Maybe God communicated with him some other way.  But the command goes out - we are fleeing now.

Everyone in your group is getting ready to flee.  Things are getting organized.  But all the other COG fellowships are not fleeing.

You know something about the place of safety.  There will be no Internet.  There will be no post office.  You cannot work from home in the place of safety.  You cannot contribute to the preaching of the gospel and the Ezekiel warning.  Going to the place of safety means the end of your being able to send money or help get the message out.  One or more other COG fellowships is not going to the place of safety and they are still doing the work.

And while the work has been increasing, there are still millions yet to reach who have not heard our message.

Any fulfillment of prophecies that directly tie in with fleeing, such as the abomination of desolation, is not 100% clear.  Maybe those prophecies have been fulfilled or maybe not, depending on how you interpret events. But the leader of your fellowship is clear.  The time to flee is now.

The two witnesses have not been made known yet.  Maybe there are a couple of individuals who seem like they would be the ones.  They will be given miraculous power at the very beginning of the great tribulation, after the Church has fled to a place of safety.

That is the scenario.  Here is my question.

Will you go?  Will you obey the pastor of your fellowship and go to the place of safety as he tells you?  Or will you stay behind, risking going through the horrors of the tribulation if your pastor is right?

If you go, your contribution to getting the true gospel and the Ezekiel warning message out to those who have not heard it yet will come to an end.  Fewer people will hear the warning.  But if you stay, you could be buying a lot of suffering and martyrdom not only for you but for your family also.  And if you are weak, you may cave in under duress and torture and sin rather than die for the truth and end up losing your salvation.

And even at this late date, the message can make a difference to those who hear it.  Some may respond positively, even in a few days, even as the people of Nineveh repented at the preaching of Jonah and escaped punishment (Jonah 3:1-10).  God may spare them from the worst of the suffering and bring them into the millennium.  The message can still make a difference.

Maybe your pastor is wrong.  Maybe his dream was not from God.  "Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits, whether they are of God; because many false prophets have gone out into the world" (1 John 4:1).  

You want to respect God's government.  You want to obey authority (Hebrews 13:7, 17).  But you don't want to stop helping others while there are still a lot of people to warn.

What would you do?

For myself, I cannot say for sure what I would do in the future.  I have free moral agency, but I cannot make tomorrow's decisions today.

But as I consider this scenario now, I am inclined to think I should stay and continue to contribute to the work while there is still work to do, while there is still the opportunity to help others be saved.  I think that is what God would want me to do.  Not to try to save myself.  To try to save thousands or millions of others.

Paul can be an example.  He said in a certain place that he might be willing to be accursed from Christ, to lose his salvation, for the sake of saving others.

"I tell the truth in Christ, I am not lying, my conscience also bearing me witness in the Holy Spirit, that I have great sorrow and continual grief in my heart. For I could wish that I myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my countrymen according to the flesh" (Romans 9:1-3).

Yes, we should make ourselves ready.  But should that be our primary focus? Or should our first priority be doing God's work of getting the message out to help the salvation of millions?

What is your focus?

The Main Thing Is to Keep the Main Thing the Main Thing

I have heard someone in the Church of God say, "The main thing is to keep the main thing the main thing".

But what is the main thing?

Some will say, "The main thing is to make it into the kingdom of God".

I disagree.

Others may add to that, "and to help others in the Church of God, our brethren, also make it into the kingdom".

Again, I disagree.

If that is what you think, you and I are not on the same page.

"What can be more important than making it into the kingdom and helping the brethren make it into the kingdom?", you ask.

I will tell you.

This is what I think is, "the main thing".

The eternal salvation of millions of people is potentially at stake.  And God's glory and name and reputation for love and fairness for all eternity is at stake, and thus the quality of life in the kingdom forever is at stake.  That is what is more important.  

Here is the situation.

Millions of Americans, Canadians, Britons, and others are headed for the great tribulation without a warning.  They are going to be punished for things like Christmas, Easter, Sunday, etc. they don't know are wrong.  They don't know because no one has told them.  

Without that warning God will seem unfair, and it will be hard for the people to ever trust God and repent.  Many may not be able to do it and will go into the lake of fire and lose salvation forever, and the rest of us can struggle for eternity to understand how God could be fair in not giving a warning while there was time for the people to repent and escape.

That warning has not gone out, and there is not a single Church of God organization that is faithful to qualify to do it, as far as I know.  NOT ONE!  All are disqualified.  

That is why some ordained minister must raise up a new group and be faithful to qualify to get that message out to the millions.  That is, unless a leader of an existing Church of God fellowship repents and follows Christ in the basic principles needed to get the message out powerfully, but that does not appear likely.

This is a lot more important than unity.

If the Church of God won't do it (to our shame), I trust God that He will get that message out even if He has to use a Protestant minister or a Catholic priest to do it.

We have to get the true gospel message and the Ezekiel warning out to all in the nations of Israel.  And if necessary, some full-time minister or local elder, someone ordained as a minister who can baptize, lay on hands for the receiving of the Holy Spirit, and receive tithes, must raise up a new group to do it.

To me, this is the main thing.

If a COG minister who is best qualified and has the opportunity to do it does not want to do it because he thinks some so-called "unity" with Laodiceans is more important, then the job must fall to someone else.

The responsibility is on the shoulders of every minister including local elders in the whole Church of God, whether they realize it or not.

Doing God's essential work for the sake of His name and reputation and glory and for the sake of the salvation of millions is more important than peace and unity in the Church of God in this Laodicean era.

To me, that is the "main thing".

Jason Fritts Sermons Removed from CGA Website

Someone mentioned in comments, and I have confirmed, that Mr. Jason Fritts's sermons have been removed from the CGA website.

This raises questions in my mind, and may in the minds of CGA members and former members.

Why?

What valid reason according to God's perfect law of love can there be for removing those sermons?

Is there something wrong with those sermons?  If so, why were they posted to the CGA website for so long?

Were those sermons beneficial and spiritually profitable?  Producing spiritually profitable sermons was one of the things CGA, out of members' tithes and offerings, was paying Mr. Fritts to do.  He was paid to feed the flock.  In a sense, the members paid him to feed them through their tithes and offerings.  In a sense, one could say that those sermons belong to the members and former members of CGA who paid Mr. Fritts to give them.

Did Mr. Fritts fail to do a good job with his sermons?  Apparently not according to CGA which posted his sermons for years.  If there was something wrong with them, why were they on the website for so long?  And why would CGA for years pay Mr. Fritts a salary if he was making bad sermons?

Have those sermons been helpful to members to go back and review past lessons?  I think so.

So why were they removed?

Were they removed because Mr. Fritts was causing division by raising up a new COG fellowship and trying to draw members out of CGA and into his own organization?  I don't think so.  I have heard no indication he has started a new group or is in the process of forming a new group.

Apparently he was fired for sticking to both the Bible and the teachings of Herbert W. Armstrong, and then he quietly began to attend someplace else, not causing division, not starting a new group.  I have listened to his sermons for years and I cannot recall him ever saying anything that contradicted CGA, Mr. Monson, or Mr. Armstrong.  He left as quietly as one could.  He has done his best not to cause division, as far as I can see.

So why take down his sermons that can be helpful to both CGA members and non-members alike?  Why take down those sermons that can help Church of God members draw closer to God?  Is that love?

CGA has repeatedly emphasized the point that they will not change Mr. Armstrong's doctrines.  They will not add to or change the doctrines he taught.  They think that they are holding fast to the truths he taught, thinking they are Philadelphians to whom Christ says, "hold fast", yet not holding fast to the way of life he and Loma practiced, the way of learning new things from the Bible and believing the Bible more than any man or church.

How ironic that the one issue that has seriously divided CGA was not some new doctrine or change someone proposed but one of the very points of doctrine that Mr. Armstrong was right about.  Mr. Armstrong taught that Jesus Christ is part of the true gospel.  That is also what the Bible teaches.

This was not "new truth".  This was what Mr. Armstrong taught.

And yet, here we seem to have a case where a leading minister was put out for sticking to what Mr. Armstrong correctly taught.

How unnecessary all this has been.  Anyone can make a mistake, and CGA could simply have admitted the mistake in not following Mr. Armstrong and the Bible correctly, and fixed it.  The members could have accepted that.  It would even be refreshing to hear the leader of a group say, I made a mistake.

So apparently CGA picks and chooses what teachings of Mr. Armstrong to keep and which ones to throw out.  Makeup also comes to mind.  Mr. Armstrong telling the Church before he died to follow the next pastor general (Mr. Tkach) also comes to mind.

And CGA is willing to divide the entire fellowship over the choices of what to retain and what to throw out from Mr. Armstrong's doctrines, but not according to God's word.

So what is the motive for removing Mr. Fritts's sermons?  Love?  Love for God and love for the brethren?  Agape love?  Philadelphia love?

Christ told Peter, "Feed My sheep".  For years, Mr. Fritts has done that.  Then, CGA removes that good spiritual food from the website.

So again, what is the motive?  Love?  Spite?  Fear?

Fear of what?  Mr. Fritts drawing members after himself?  But he has gone out of his way not to do that.  He has not started a new group nor apparently does he want to.  You couldn't leave more quietly and peacefully than he did.

It gets worse than that.  Every service has an opening prayer in which the man giving the prayer asks God's blessing on the service and asks God to bless the speaking.  Presumably God does that.  God the Father and Jesus Christ help to inspire the sermon.  That does not mean that the sermon speaker cannot make a mistake or always follows exactly where Christ leads.  They are human and can make mistakes.  Nevertheless, to the degree God answers the opening prayer for inspiration and blessing on the service, God is involved.

So those sermons that CGA has removed are not just the work of Mr. Jason Fritts but also the work of Christ.

So what Christ has built, CGA has torn down.

Removing Mr. Fritts's sermons from the CGA website has been a serious mistake in judgment.

I hope CGA will reconsider and restore Mr. Fritts's past sermons to their website.

"Therefore by their fruits you will know them" (Matthew 7:20).

If you have not done so yet, check out my last post for some details about what has happened and been happening.  This was published shortly before this one, so if you only check my blog every few days and look at the most recent post, you might miss noticing it.  Check it out.

Recent Comments about Jason Fritts and the Issue of Christ Being Part of the Gospel

For those who are following the situation with Mr. Fritts, and also the issue of Christ being part of the gospel, there have appeared a number of informative comments under the posts regarding Mr. Fritts I have published since the first one I published on 5/25/26. I have published 6 posts so far including this one.  I suggest, for those interested, that you look at the comments under each one.  There are a number of new comments, some of them mine, but not together - they are under a number of different posts.

In one of my comments I referred to one or more past posts of mine on the subject of Acts 5, Ananias lying to Peter.

I have searched for that post, and found it.  Perhaps there is more than one if you search earlier than this one.  Look at the post titled, "Is It Ever Right for a Christian to Lie?", dated October 18, 2020.

I make the point that Peter did not accuse Ananias of lying to an apostle or to a minister.  Ananias lied to God.  How?  By lying to an apostle or minister?  No, it doesn't say that.  He lied to God by lying to the Holy Spirit.  How did he do that? By lying to a member who had the Holy Spirit in him.

In other words, the Bible doesn't say that this was serious in God's sight because Peter was an apostle.  It was serious because Peter had the Holy Spirit.

But by the same principle, it can also be serious when if a minister lies to a Church of God member who has the Holy Spirit.  As I understand this lesson, a minister who lies to his members who have the Holy Spirit is lying to God!

And members who support and follow that minister have to bear some responsibility, if they stay with him after knowing that he lies, because God says, "Keep yourself far from a false matter; do not kill the innocent and righteous. For I will not justify the wicked" (Exodus 23:7).  Also, "You shall not circulate a false report. Do not put your hand with the wicked to be an unrighteous witness" (Exodus 23:1).

I am not trying to be overly harsh, but that is what God says.

Also, God does not have kind words for ordained ministers who abandon the flock.

"I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd gives His life for the sheep. But a hireling, he who is not the shepherd, one who does not own the sheep, sees the wolf coming and leaves the sheep and flees; and the wolf catches the sheep and scatters them. The hireling flees because he is a hireling and does not care about the sheep" (John 10:11-13).

"And the word of the LORD came to me, saying, 'Son of man, prophesy against the shepherds of Israel, prophesy and say to them, "Thus says the Lord GOD to the shepherds: 'Woe to the shepherds of Israel who feed themselves! Should not the shepherds feed the flocks? You eat the fat and clothe yourselves with the wool; you slaughter the fatlings, but you do not feed the flock. The weak you have not strengthened, nor have you healed those who were sick, nor bound up the broken, nor brought back what was driven away, nor sought what was lost; but with force and cruelty you have ruled them. So they were scattered because there was no shepherd; and they became food for all the beasts of the field when they were scattered. My sheep wandered through all the mountains, and on every high hill; yes, My flock was scattered over the whole face of the earth, and no one was seeking or searching for them.' " '  Therefore, you shepherds, hear the word of the LORD: 'As I live,' says the Lord GOD, 'surely because My flock became a prey, and My flock became food for every beast of the field, because there was no shepherd, nor did My shepherds search for My flock, but the shepherds fed themselves and did not feed My flock' - therefore, O shepherds, hear the word of the LORD! Thus says the Lord GOD: 'Behold, I am against the shepherds, and I will require My flock at their hand; I will cause them to cease feeding the sheep, and the shepherds shall feed themselves no more; for I will deliver My flock from their mouths, that they may no longer be food for them' " (Ezekiel 34:1-10).

"So when they had eaten breakfast, Jesus said to Simon Peter, 'Simon, son of Jonah, do you love Me more than these?' He said to Him, 'Yes, Lord; You know that I love You.' He said to him, 'Feed My lambs.' He said to him again a second time, 'Simon, son of Jonah, do you love Me?' He said to Him, 'Yes, Lord; You know that I love You.' He said to him, 'Tend My sheep.' He said to him the third time, 'Simon, son of Jonah, do you love Me?' Peter was grieved because He said to him the third time, 'Do you love Me?' And he said to Him, 'Lord, You know all things; You know that I love You.' Jesus said to him, 'Feed My sheep' " (John 21:15-17).

Sometimes it takes time for a minister, or any member, to sort things out and come to know God's will for them.  I understand that.  Nevertheless, it is good to be reminded of the overall truth, regardless of how details fall, that an ordained minister has a calling to serve God's people, and in some cases, to preach the gospel and the Ezekiel warning to Israel to prepare our nations for the great tribulation that is coming.  This should be motivated by love for our neighbors and for our brethren in the Church of God.

 
 

Did Herbert W. Armstrong Teach that Salvation through Christ Is Part of the Gospel?

The question, what is the true gospel, has been controversial in the Church, even today, to the extent it was a contributing cause for a split.  

As I see it so far, and I am yet to hear both sides fully, one side says that the true gospel is only the good news of the coming kingdom of God and that salvation through Christ is not part of that gospel, even though it also should be taught.  The other side says that salvation through Christ is definitely part of the true gospel.

What did Mr. Armstrong teach?  Did he teach that salvation through Jesus Christ is part of the true gospel when that gospel includes the kingdom of God?

This question may be important to some because some people and groups think that Mr. Armstrong's teachings should never be changed.  So if such a person or group follows Mr. Armstrong more than the Bible, the question for them can be important.

In examining Mr. Armstrong's teaching on this subject I will examine his teachings in two books, Mystery of the Ages and The Incredible Human Potential.  

Mystery of the Ages does not have a lot on what is included in the term, the true gospel.  It teaches all the major truths of the gospel, but does not say a lot about that term, "gospel".

On page 200 of Mystery of the Ages, top half of page, Mr. Armstrong writes that Jesus Christ taught His disciples the true gospel of the kingdom of God, and that this included the whole purpose of God in creating the human race.

On page 257, top half, he writes that the churches of this world omit the teaching that Christ is coming as king and ruler, and thus reject Christ's gospel message.  This agrees with what I have said that a message about Christ but without the teaching of the coming government of God is a false gospel.

From the bottom of page 278 through page 279, Mr. Armstrong says that false teachers taught a false gospel, teaching Christ as savior but omitting the teaching that sin is the transgression of the law of God, omitting the coming kingdom of God, the removal of Satan, the government of God ruling the earth, and the opening of salvation to all of humanity, snd that men can become literal sons of God and members of God's family as actual God beings.  By the way this is worded, Mr. Armstrong is implying that all these things that a false gospel message omits are part of the true gospel.

In The Incredible Human Potential, page 1 bottom half through page 2 top half, Mr. Armstrong says that the true gospel, when fully understood, reveals the incredible human potential, the way to peace and happiness, the most necessary information about the human race, the true values, and how man's awesome human potential may be achieved (in other words, how we can be saved).

In the last part of page 10 through all of page 11 he says that the gospel explains the origin of Satan the devil and how he became the great deceiver of mankind.  He says that the true gospel, had it been heeded, could have prevented all the human misery that has occurred, thus indicating that the true gospel includes knowledge of the law and ways of God.  He says that the true gospel includes all these truths: the earth's first prehistoric inhabitants, the reason man was created, the cause of evil and suffering, the nature of the human mind, and what spiritual salvation is and why we need it.

Can we see from this how all-encompassing is the truth included in the true gospel according to Mr. Armstrong?  Since it includes information about salvation, it must include everything about Christ and His sacrifice so we can be saved.

On page 12, middle, he says that the true gospel reveals a wide range of knowledge from God.

On page 15, bottom half, he says that a complete understanding of the message Christ brought from the Father, the gospel, involves an overall understanding of everything.  

On page 16, top half of page, Mr. Armstrong writes that if those in the world who preach what may be called a gospel of salvation really understood and taught what salvation is and how we can be saved, it could be part of the true gospel.  

On page 32, Mr. Armstrong says that the subject of the kingdom of God is an all-encompassing subject.  It includes the pre-history of the universe.

On page 160, top half of page, Mr. Armstrong states that the kingdom of God is both the government of God and the family of God.

It is clear that Mr. Armstrong taught that the true gospel, the good news of the coming kingdom of God, is a broad subject that includes much Bible truth including matters of salvation through Christ made possible by His sacrifice.

If someone today teaches that salvation through Christ is not part of the true gospel of the kingdom of God, they are contradicting Mr. Armstrong.

I recently heard a sermon published by Living Church of God by Mr. Wallace Smith entitled, "The Centrality of Jesus Christ".  In it he shows by quoting from Mr. Armstrong that Mr. Armstrong taught that salvation through Jesus Christ was part of the gospel.  He quotes from letters or other publications of Mr. Armstrong besides the parts of Mr. Armstrong's books I referred to.  I thought the sermon was good and I reccmmend it.

As I explained in a previous post, the word "and" in a passage such as Acts 8:12 where it says, "But when they believed Philip as he preached the things concerning the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ, both men and women were baptized", does not necessarily mean that the gospel of the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ are separate things, but that word "and" can be used for emphasis.  This is saying that both were preached, not that one or the other is not part of the gospel.

For someone who teaches that Mr. Armstrong's teachings should not be changed or added to to say that the name of Jesus Christ and salvation through Jesus Christ are not part of the gospel seems inconsistent to me.  If you are going to change Mr. Armstrong's teaching on this point, at least admit you are changing his doctrine.  To just say that the name of Christ and the gospel should both be preached but are distinct but related things is not sufficient.  The name of Jesus Christ is definitely part of the gospel.  And if you want to say that this is only a matter of terminology - what's the difference as long as we preach both? - then why should it be so important as to split the Church of God over it?

If terminology is important - do we call salvation through Christ a part of the gospel or say it is something separate though related that must also be taught? - then those who say that it is not part of the gospel are wrong according to Mr. Armstrong, they are wrong according to the Bible, and they are wrong - period.

They should admit error, publicly correct their mistake, and teach the truth.

But they will accept correction only if they are wise.  "He who corrects a scoffer gets shame for himself, And he who rebukes a wicked man only harms himself. Do not correct a scoffer, lest he hate you; Rebuke a wise man, and he will love you. Give instruction to a wise man, and he will be still wiser; Teach a just man, and he will increase in learning" (Proverbs 9:7-9).

Mr. Jason Fritts

I don't have any new solid information about Mr. Fritts.  There are more questions than answers at this point.  But I hsve a few thoughts I will share.

It is apparent that he does not want to raise up a new Church of God fellowship.  That actually says something good about his character, that he is humbled by the responsibility of leading a new group and that he does not want to create more division than already exists in the whole Church of God.  I can empathize with him on that.

But God has ways of moving us in directions we do not want to go.  

When Mr. Fritts separated from Church of God Assembly (regardless of whether he was fired or quit), he may have thought he could join an existing group.  He has, after all, a lot to offer in terms of ability and experience.

Yet, his very experience and ability may make other groups hesitant to hire him.  There may be a fear he will leave after a while taking brethren with him.

How often do any of us set out to do something, assuming things will be a certain way, and finding they are not, whether or not we know the reason?

And if God is involved, He can easily block Mr. Fritts from being hired by any existing Church of God fellowship, if that is His will.  He may want Mr. Fritts to raise up a new group even if that is not Mr. Fritts's first choice.

I am curious about what Mr. Fritts has been doing the last several Sabbaths.  Does he attend someplace?  Does he tune in to live services someplace on the Internet (there are many available)?  Does he preach a sermon to a small group of his family and friends and a few Church of God members he knows, but without broadcasting services on the Internet?  Or does he broadcast to a few people but does not otherwise make himself known to everyone at this time?

I cannot imagine him only praying, reading the Bible, and sleeping on the Sabbath.

I would love to hear or read him explain in his own words what he believes the true gospel is.  If I am wrong in my views of what the true gospel is, maybe I could learn from him and be corrected.

He probably needs more time for God to work things out for him.  But the Feast is approaching, and there may be a lot of members whose plans are up in the air because of this.  And Oh, what a wide spectrum of views various ministers and members or former members of Church of God Assembly may have!

Is it safe to say this whole situation can be complicated?


On the world scene, the whole world, allies and enemies alike, is seeing the divisions and the weakness of the United States.  They also see our reluctance to be fully committed to defending their interests and their safety.  At the same time there are signs of weakness in the leadership of Russia and China.  Russia may have a new leader soon, and the same is possible for China.

Everything is in flux.  The world is fast-changing.  AI is growing.  

Europe, especially Germany, feels the need to become stronger militarily, independent of the United States.  They are rearming.  Things may take time, maybe several years, to work out.  But things are definitely moving in the direction that Bible prophecy predicts.

More on Salvation through Christ Being Part of the True Gospel

I have written on this in the last two posts, but I have something to add.  I want to give an analogy to show that information and details about good news is part of the good news itself.

The true gospel is the good news of the kingdom of God.  The kingdom of God is the family of God ruling the earth and the universe as the government of God.  Christ will return to set up His kingdom on this earth and with the resurrected saints as the family of God will rule the nations of the earth and bring happiness to all mankind.  That is good news.

I have said and maintained that any information and details about that kingdom is part of the good news and therefore part of the true gospel, provided the core teaching of God's kingdom being set up on this earth is included.  Without that core teaching about the kingdom, any information or details about salvation become a false gospel if presented as the gospel.  But with the core teaching of God's kingdom being set up on this earth, information about that kingdom, including how to enter that kingdom through salvation through Christ, becomes part of the good news and is part of the true gospel.

Here is the analogy.

Suppose you have an eighteen year old daughter living in your house.  She is a good driver and has always wanted a car but cannot afford one.  So you say to her, "I have good news.  I am going to give you a car".  

She is overjoyed.

Then you tell her some specifics.  "I have already purchased the car and it will be delivered sometime next week.  You like convertibles, so I got you a Cadillac convertible.  It is brand new.  I know red is your favorite color, so I ordered a red convertible.  Also, since you do not have a lot of money, I am paying for the insurance and gas for a full year".  You also tell her about all the features and accessories of the car.

Are those details not part of the good news that you are giving your daughter a car?  Of course they are.  They enhance the good news and are part of the good news.  Your daughter is happy she is getting a car - any car - but she is delighted that it is new, a convertible, and her favorite color, red.  She is even more happy when you tell her you are paying for the gas and insurance.  All of that is part of the good news.

But without the core message that she is getting a car, what good are the details?  Telling her you are giving her something red is not good news - it could be an apple!  It could be a radish and she doesn't like radishes.

Likewise, the main part of the true gospel is that God will set up His kingdom on the earth that will bring happiness to the earth.  For the establishment and the authority of that kingdom see Daniel 2:37-45.  For the happiness that will exist all over the earth, see Isaiah 2:2-4, Isaiah 25:6-8, Isaiah 11:6-9, Isaiah 35:5-7, Psalm 98:4-9, and many other passages you can find in the Old Testament.  With that as the core and focus of the message, all the details and information about that kingdom - how to enter that ruling family of God through salvation made possible by Christ's sacrifice, the law of God that will be practiced in the kingdom, the happiness that will spread all over the earth - all that becomes part of the good news of that kingdom and part of the true gospel.

Paul and others often focused on the sacrifice of Christ and salvation through Christ because the Jews and God-fearing Gentiles already knew about the government aspect and other aspects of the kingdom of God from the Old Testament.

They knew that God would set up a kingdom to rule this earth from the account in Daniel about Nebuchadnezzar's dream.  They knew that the earth would be full of the knowledge of the LORD as the oceans are full of water (Isaiah 11:9).  They knew that men would beat the swords into plowshares and would learn war no more (Isaiah 2:4). They knew that the wolf would dwell with the lamb and the lion would eat straw like the ox and no one would hurt or destroy (Isaiah 11:6-9).  They knew of the happiness that people all over the earth would enjoy because of God's rule.  Paul must have reminded them of those things from time to time, no doubt, but he concentrated on the parts they did not know - the sacrifice of Christ and salvation through Christ.  And the things he taught them about Christ and salvation through faith, not works, were definitely part of the true gospel because they included the good news of how men could be forgiven and enter that kingdom.

For someone to say that the kingdom is good news but information about that kingdom and why and how it will be happy is not part of the good news is, frankly, a little bit nuts.

Common sense should tell you that if something is good news, details and information about that thing is also part of the good news.

Now, this raises a question.  What should the Church of God focus on in preaching the true gospel?  What should we spend most of our time and money on, salvation through Christ or the family of God ruling the earth?

That is not a matter of doctrine but of policy.  What should our policy be?  How should we do the work?  How should we organize and present our material?

That is a judgment call the leaders and ministers of the Church must make.

I will offer my thoughts on that.

In Paul's day, most people knew about the government aspect of God's kingdom ruling the earth, but they didn't know about Christ.  Today, it is the opposite.  Most people in our western nations who believe in God know teachings about Christ but not about the government of God ruling the earth.

Paul often concentrated his teaching on Christ because that was the part they did not know.  Today, we can concentrate on God having a family and ruling the earth as the government of God because that is the part most people do not know.

Yet, there may be occasions when it is best and most effective to lead with the truth about salvation through Christ.  This would be for the purpose of establishing common ground with our audience.  You first talk about what you agree about, then from there lead your readers and listeners to new knowledge they do not have.  Paul sometimes used this approach.  "For though I am free from all men, I have made myself a servant to all, that I might win the more; and to the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might win Jews; to those who are under the law, as under the law, that I might win those who are under the law; to those who are without law, as without law (not being without law toward God, but under law toward Christ), that I might win those who are without law; to the weak I became as weak, that I might win the weak. I have become all things to all men, that I might by all means save some" (1 Corinthians 9:19-22).  Also see Acts 17:22-23.

When to use what approach is a judgment call, but neither approach is wrong when used under the right circumstances.  It is all God's truth.


A word about Jason Fritts.  So far, I have not yet heard or read any information about what he is doing.  He may be very busy getting organized and setting things up.

But it occurred to me that he is better prepared to raise up a new fellowship than most leaders who have done so.  

He is young, energetic, and intelligent.  He has had recent experience working closely with Mr. Sheldon Monson setting up Church of God Assembly when that group came out of Living Church of God.  So he must know how these things work.  He probably has a todo list built into his brain with "how to" instructions for each item.  Most leaders who set up a new group were doing it for the first time.  This is a second time for him.  He has that advantage.

We will see.